Al-ready, LLC v. Perry - SCOTUSblog. Hollingsworth v. Perry Item Preview podcast_us-supreme-court-2012-term-a_hollingsworth-v-perry_1000376574556_itemimage.png . Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case. Hollingsworth v. Perry were a series of United States federal court cases that legalized same-sex marriage in the State of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex … Hollingsworth v. Perry. remove-circle Share or Embed This Item. Although most standing cases consider whether a plaintiff has satisfied the requirement when filing suit, Article III demands that an “actual controversy” persist throughout all stages of litigation. On this case, the petitioner was Dennis Hollingsworth, and the respondent was Kristin Perry. Hollingsworth v. Perry were a series of United States federal court cases that legalized same-sex marriage in the State of California. Perry rejects Hollingsworth’s claim that rational-basis review permits excluding groups that the state views as not pertinent to its objective from a state-conferred benefit. Instead, Perry contends that the line petitioners have drawn excluding same-sex couples bears no relation to Hollingsworth’s objective of tying marriage to procreation. Perry." 2 HOLLINGSWORTH v. PERRY Syllabus . Integrated Direct Quotation: According to an article published by Oyez, “In this case, because the petitioners had only a generalized grievance in the form of a desire to defend Proposition 8, they did not have standing under Article III. Hollingsworth v. Perry (Audio Download): The Supreme Court of the United States, uncredited, Oyez: Amazon.com.au: Audible Oyez, 21 Nov. 2017, . Hollingsworth v. Perry. I strongly believe that the Supreme Court ruling in 2013 will have a great impact on the CJ system. Amazon.com: Hollingsworth v. Perry (Audible Audio Edition): The Supreme Court of the United States, uncredited, Oyez: Audible Audiobooks Hollingsworth v Perry Paraphrase Statement Stated by Oyez in the case from ENG 6 at Florida Virtual School er words, the litigant must seek a remedy for a personal and tangible harm. Hollingsworth v. Perry (Audio Download): Amazon.in: The Supreme Court of the United States, uncredited, Oyez An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. "Hollingsworth v.